As Paul Kagame embarks on another term, Rwanda finds itself at a pivotal moment. Supporters highlight the nation’s development under his leadership, while the international community closely monitors concerns over human rights and the concentration of power in Kagame’s hands.
The inauguration in Kigali was more than a formality; it was a clear demonstration of Kagame’s enduring influence and the complex legacy he continues to shape in Rwanda.
Recently re-elected as Rwanda’s president, Kagame was sworn in during a grand ceremony in the capital, Kigali.
The 66-year-old leader, who has held power since the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, took the oath of office, pledging unwavering loyalty to the Republic of Rwanda.
“I, Kagame Paul, do solemnly swear to Rwanda that I will remain loyal to the Republic of Rwanda, observe and defend the Constitution and other laws diligently, and fulfill the responsibility entrusted to me,” he declared, reinforcing his commitment to lead the nation.
Kagame’s inauguration signals the start of yet another term in office, following an election in which he ran virtually unopposed.
Despite criticism from international observers and human rights organizations, Kagame’s hold on power remains firm. His critics, including potential rivals, were largely sidelined, with two of his strongest opponents barred from running for high office.
Kagame first gained prominence as the leader of the rebel forces that ended the 1994 genocide, which claimed nearly 800,000 lives.
Since then, he has been Rwanda’s de facto leader, officially assuming the presidency in 2000. Under his leadership, Rwanda has seen significant economic growth and stability, earning praise for its progress.
In 2015, a referendum allowed Rwandans to vote on lifting the two-term limit for presidents.
The result overwhelmingly supported the change, enabling Kagame to potentially remain in office until 2034.
This move has sparked debate about the future of democracy in Rwanda, with many questioning the fairness of the referendum and the broader implications for governance in the country.
